How Can One Tell In What Direction Evolution is Going?
Stanley Sawyer
Abstract:
In the long run, most important changes in biological organisms are due to
the replacements of genes by new genes that do a better job for the
organism. However, in large, established populations, many biologists
believe that most evolutionary change is, instead, due to the replacement
of genes by slightly deleterious variants.
The reason for this is that most mutations are harmful rather than helpful, and that mildly harmful mutations can replace a better, established gene by the chance effects of who mates with whom and who happens to survive. This would take a long time for a large population, but most large populations have been around for a very long time. We can study this question from the distribution of DNA in populations in the present. The distribution of a new gene is different if it is advantageous, deleterious, or selectively the same as the old gene. We can obtain more information from the differences between two related species. Current data suggests that most recent evolutionary changes in fruit flies were advantageous, but that most recent evolutionary changes in a common weed were deleterious. Investigating this process in detail leads to difficult problems in probability theory and statistics, as well as to the use of a technique called Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
Transparencies for Talk
(PDF format)
(Some genetics, some probability, some statistics, using MCMC to
estimate parameters)
The main parameters:
Graphics for the Talk:
The following are plots using 5000 values from runs of a
high-dimensional Markov Chain
with 21,000,000 or 5,500,000 iterations:
The three main parameters have a TRIMODAL distribution in the full run:
Return to Stanley Sawyer non-course handout home page
Last modified November 1, 2006